Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Cox Corporation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1932No. 23175. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerman, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants on a promissory note for $3,500, due ninety days from date, with interest at seven per cent per annum. Defendants’ answer to the action on the note was the defense of usury. Plaintiff replied, alleging that defendants solicited plaintiff to join in the venture of purchase and sale of scrap steel, on some of which defendants had secured an option, and for which defendants had secured buyers in the Orient. The reply also contained the allegations that an agreement had been entered into between plaintiff and defendants, by the terms of which plaintiff should advance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orvis v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Easter v. American West FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Colagrossi v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tacoma Hotel, Inc. v. Morrison Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Tacoma Commercial Bank v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Investors Syndicate v. Baskerville Bros. Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API