Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether a claimant’s petition for modification of benefits was untimely under Section 413 of The Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §772, when the petition was not filed until five-months after the claimant had received the entirety of his 500-week statutory remedy of partial disability benefits, pursuant to Section 306 of the Act, 77 P.S. §512.

Robert S. Stewart (Claimant) and PA Glass Sand — U.S. Silica and INA/CIGNA (collectively, Employer) have filed cross-appeals from the order of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Roussos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Berisford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Deppenbrook v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Cicchiello v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Hashagen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API