Grand Traverse Fruit & Produce Exchange v. Thomas Canning Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by the Grand Traverse Fruit & Produce Exchange against the Thomas Canning Company for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendant in June, 1916, to deliver to it during *96the season. 45 cars of sour cherries at a stated price. As the season progressed it became evident to plaintiff’s manager, Mr. Kern, that the crop was not going to be as large as anticipated, and that it might have difficulty in filling the order. With this in mind Mr. Kern approached the defendant with the idea of reducing the number of cars to be delivered, and it is his claim that defendant did consent to reduce the number to 22% cars. Plaintiff began to make deliveries, and, after delivering 15…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Welz v. RhodiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Katz v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Spann v. BaltzellSupreme Court of Florida · 1847
- Abell v. MunsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. RendeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Jacob v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Curry v. ShearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Palmerlee v. Republic Acceptance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921