Legal Opinion
Shpak v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated/May 22, 2001, as granted the cross motion of the defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing *591the complaint insofar as asserted against it for failure to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e (2).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs notice of claim did not comply with General Municipal Law § 50-e (2), because it failed to identify the location of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caselli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Broida v. BancroftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Yankana v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ames v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wai Man Hui v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gagnon v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Puco v. DeFeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Lauro v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Marino v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004