Legal Opinion

Brubaker v. Branine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 21, 1985No. 56,958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, C.J.:

The issues presented in this case stem from consolidated appeals taken by Ivan, Etta and Larry Branine (defendants-appellants) from a decision of the trial court deter mining liability on a motion for summary judgment and a subsequent judgment granting Leo D. and Ruth J. Brubaker (plaintiffs-appellees) a proportionate share of the landowners’ royalties under an oil and gas lease containing an “entirety clause.” The facts are not in dispute.

On September 20, 1976, the defendants, Ivan and Etta Branine, granted an oil and gas lease to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quenzer v. QuenzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Dearborn Motors Credit Corporation v. NeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. Skinner v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Carlock v. KrugSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. CoppleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. McKissick v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Rupe v. Triton Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  4. Graphic Technology, Inc. v. Pitney Bowes Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. Hauptman v. WMC, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API