Iverson v. Graham

Experience dictated the use of the word “verbatim” in that portion of Rule on Appeal 43 (RCW Vol. 0), which reads:

“ . . . No error assigned to any finding or findings of fact made or refused will be considered unless so much of the finding or findings as is claimed to be erroneous shall be set out verbatim in the brief. . . . ”

We can only repeat that verbatim means “verbatim.” The assignments of error directed to the findings of fact which were not set out verbatim will not be considered. Beagle v. Beagle (1961), 57 Wn. (2d) 753, 757, 359 P. (2d) 808; San Juan Cy. v. Hage (1960), 57 Wn. (2d)…