Legal Opinion

Dennis v. Enke

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1929No. File No. 6475PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■CAMFBELE, J.

On May 20, 1924, the state highway commission entered into a contract with one Enke, doing business under the name of Enke Construction Company, whereby, for a consideration approximating $62,973.04 computed at unit prices, Enke agreed to do certain road construction work on state trunk highway No. 15, also known and designated as federal aid project 164. At the time of the execution of this contract, Federal Surety Company, a corporation, as surety, executed and delivered a bond in the penal sum. of $62,973.04, the condition of which bond was as follows (italics ours) :

“Now…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Basshor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. National Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Miller v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Dennis v. Great Northern Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Clifton v. NordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. CuppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Asset Recovery Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Western Material Co. v. EnkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API