Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Bedford County, Tenn.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 12, 1990No. Civ. 4-89-002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JARVIS, District Judge.

This is an action by employees of the Bedford County Ambulance Service alleging violations of §§ 7 and 8 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207, 208; Pub.L.No. 99-150, § 8, 99 Stat. 787, 791 (1985). Currently pending is the motion for partial summary judgment of plaintiffs and the cross motion for summary judgment of defendant, Bedford County, Tennessee. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment is granted, and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment is denied.

I

Legal and Factual Background

O…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Joy HALL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEDEX, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harmon Anderson v. City of Bristol, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. L.R. Wethington v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. John Zimmerli v. The City of Kansas City, MOCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. Schmitt v. State of Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Parth v. Pomona Valley Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API