Legal Opinion

State v. Holden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1992No. 9129SC165Published

1Opinion of the Court

416 S.E.2d 415 (1992)

106 N.C. App. 244

STATE of North Carolina

v.

William Lester HOLDEN.

No. 9129SC165.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 19, 1992.

Attorney General Lacy H. Thornburg, by Asst. Atty. Gen. Ellen B. Scouten, Raleigh, for the State.

V. Scott Peterson, Brevard, for defendant-appellant.

JOHNSON, Judge.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of sexual abuse occurring prior to the incident for which defendant was on trial. Defendant contends that this evidence was admissible under G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 412(b) (1988), which states: "Notwithstanding any…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. DeanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API