Legal Opinion

People v. Matlock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1986No. Docket 83273PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted by a jury of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. MCL 750.520b(l)(a); MSA 28.788(2)(l)(a). He appeals as of right. He raises several issues on appeal, including violation of his right to a speedy trial and the erroneous admission of a rape counselor’s testi mony regarding the complainant’s credibility. We find that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial, but that the admission of the rape counsel- or’s testimony was reversible error. Thus we reverse defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

Defendant is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. GrimmettMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. IzzoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. WallaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. McCafferty v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API