People v. Izzo

Defendant appeals as of right *729his jury conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, contrary to MCL 750.520b(l)(f); MSA 28.788(2X1X0.

Defendant raises three issues on appeal, the first two of which have no merit and do not require discussion. The third issue is framed as follows:

"Did the trial court commit reversible error by allowing, over defense objection, a psychiatrist to deliberately invade the province of the jury and testify, upon insufficient foundation, that he believed the complainant’s story?”

We find that the trial court erred and reverse for the reason that the testimony…