Legal Opinion
Artvale, Inc. v. Rugby Fabrics Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,667,775 brought by the patent’s present owner, Artvale, Inc., against Rugby Fabrics Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Barmil Associates, Ltd., two of Artvale’s competitors in the manufacture and sale of knitted textiles. Defendants deny infringement and plead as affirmative defenses and counterclaims unfair competition and breach of an agreement entered into between the parties on October 26, 1959 in settlement of a prior action involving the same patent. The reply denies the material allegations of the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- John Koufakis v. Thomas Carvel and Franchise Licensors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Nepera Chemical, Inc. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Allianz Risk Transfer AGCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Artvale, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Rugby Fabrics Corp. And Barmil Associates, Ltd., Defendants-Respondents-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.