Legal Opinion

Batchelor v. Heiskell, Donelson, Bearman, Adams, Williams & Kirsch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 17, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

This is an action for legal malpractice. The defendants, Heiskell, Donelson, Bear-man, Adams, Williams and Kirsch, et al. (hereinafter “Heiskell,” “Heiskell Donel-son” or “Defendants”), moved for summary judgment contending that the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The trial court denied Defendants’ summary judgment motion.

In June 1974 Hamilton Bancshares, Inc. merged with First American Bank. In October of 1975 the plaintiffs, 1 former share holders of First American, retained Heis-kell Donelson to rescind the merger between Hamilton Bancshares and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Security Bank & Trust Co. of Ponca City v. Fabricating, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Stern v. BeerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bradson Mercantile, Inc. v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Kentucky National Insurance Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Knox-Tenn Rental Company and Robert C. Lowe v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. Smith v. PetkoffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API