Legal Opinion
Clare v. Richards
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 31, 1997No. 3:97-CV-39PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment filed on August 28, 1997. Defendants filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion on September 16, 1997. Plaintiff filed a reply to Defendants’ response on October 1, 1997. Defendants filed a response to Plaintiffs reply on October 17, 1997, followed by Plaintiffs sur-reply on October 29, 1997. Upon consideration of the motion, responses, replies, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs motion should be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clare v. RichardsDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998