Legal Opinion

Sorrell Ex Rel. Sorrell v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 9, 1960No. 47554PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

Barbara Sorrell, by her next friend Sherman Sorrell, her husband, sued Marilyn Hudson for $10,000 damages for injuries received in an intersectional automobile collision. The verdict was for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals and contends the court erred in giving an instruction on behalf of defendant and in excluding a certain ordinance offered in evidence by plaintiff.

The collision occurred about 8:20 a. m. April 8, 1957, at the intersection of Bell and 38th streets in Kansas City. Plaintiff was about 18 and her husband was about 22 years old. They had lived in Kansas…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Wilson v. ToliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. Mendenhall v. NeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Stanich v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Floyd v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whittom v. Alexander-Richardson PartnershipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Bine v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Brown v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Burks v. LeapSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Mitchell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API