Legal Opinion

Security Bank Minnesota v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1993No. 92-2247PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

This case presents an issue of first impression: whether § 1281 of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires certain taxpayers to accrue discount and interest income on certain short-term obligations, requires a commercial bank, otherwise reporting its income on the cash basis, to report interest income on short-term loans made to borrowers in the ordinary course of business as it accrues. The tax court held that § 1281 did not apply to such loans. We agree, and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

This case involves an asserted deficiency in Security Bank’s federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stocks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  2. Security State Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. Security State Bank v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Buckeye Countrymark v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Pete's Brewing Co. v. WhiteheadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API