Security Bank Minnesota v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
This case presents an issue of first impression: whether § 1281 of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires certain taxpayers to accrue discount and interest income on certain short-term obligations, requires a commercial bank, otherwise reporting its income on the cash basis, to report interest income on short-term loans made to borrowers in the ordinary course of business as it accrues. The tax court held that § 1281 did not apply to such loans. We agree, and affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
This case involves an asserted deficiency in Security Bank’s federal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Miller v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stocks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Security State Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- Security State Bank v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Buckeye Countrymark v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
- Pete's Brewing Co. v. WhiteheadDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.