Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2000No. 99-9002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we are faced with precisely the issue decided by the Eighth Circuit in Security Bank Minnesota v. Commissioner, 994 F.2d 432 (8th Cir.1993):

whether § 1281 of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires certain taxpayers to accrue discount and interest income on certain short-term obligations, requires a commercial bank, otherwise reporting its income on the cash basis, to report interest income on short-term loans made to borrowers in the ordinary course of business as it accrues.

Id. at 433. The Eighth Circuit, and the tax court in this case, held § 1281…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. True Oil Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Love Box Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lunsford v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  2. Bank One Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  3. AHG Invs., LLC v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. Battat v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2017
  5. Nihiser v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API