Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 2012No. A130980PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
In 2009 respondent Napa County Board of Supervisors1 adopted clarifying lot line adjustment ordinance No. 1331 (Ordinance). Subject to provisos, sequential lot line adjustments are included within the definition of “lot line adjustment.” (Napa County Code, § 17.02.360.) Appellant Sierra Club has facially challenged the Ordinance as violative of both the *167Subdivision Map Act2 (Map Act or act) and the California Environmental Quality Act3 (CEQA). We hold that the provisions of the Ordinance allowing sequential lot line adjustments are consistent with the Map Act’s exclusion of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sierra Club v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Sunrise Fin., LLC v. Superior Court of San Diego Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- T-Mobile West LLC v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Friends of Outlet Creek v. Mendocino County Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Grp. v. City of St. Helena, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.