Legal Opinion
Zummo v. City of Chi.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided November 1, 2018No. 17-cv-09006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge
Thomas A. Zummo was a taxicab driver. He brought this pro se lawsuit, alleging that the City of Chicago1 has denied him constitutional rights, violated antitrust laws, and violated various state laws by failing to regulate what a City ordinance calls "Transportation Network Providers" (such as Uber and Lyft) in the same way as taxicabs.2 R. 10, Compl.3 He further *1000alleges that by impounding his car and failing to allow him to contest fines related to his expired taxicab license and an unpaid water bill, the City denied him due process and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Rush Street Gaming, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Anjum v. City Of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Ghiles v. Municipal Electoral Board/Commissioners of Chicago Heights, IL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Jardaneh v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Powelson v. City of SausalitoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.