Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 24, 1980No. Civ. 71-487, 78-187PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

The initial issue which must be resolved is the appropriate date from which defendants’ actions must be examined under Title VII to determine whether liability exists. Plaintiffs have conceded that with respect to their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Second Circuit’s holding that a three-year period of limitations is applicable mandates a starting date of October 29, 1968 for such examination, which is three years prior to the filing of the complaint in Civ-71-487. See, e. g., EEOC v. Enterprise Assoc. Steamfitters, 542 F.2d 579 (2d Cir. 1976). The point of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. John Martin Oatis, David Johnson, Sr., and R. T. Young v. Crown Zellerbach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. 26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1192, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,040 Josef Eggleston and Albert Viera v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, U. A., Defendants- Edell Plummer v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, U. A., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Christman v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1981
  4. William B. Larkin Louise Seals, as Personal Representative of Spurgeon Seals, Deceased Lillie Lofton, as Personal Representative of Edward Lofton, Deceased Jesse B. Terry, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc., a Corporation, Defendant- Louis Swint and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinists Louis Swint, and Willie James Johnson, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated Clyde Humphrey v. Pullman-Standard, Bessemer, Alabama, United Steelworkers of America Local 1466 and United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, International Association of MacHinistsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API