Legal Opinion
Christman v. American Cyanamid Co.
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided November 17, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 80-0024-P(H)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, District Judge.
This action is brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19641 to redress sex discrimination allegedly practiced by the Defendant, American Cyanamid, in its employment and hiring policies for the production and maintenance work force at its plant in Willow Island, West Virginia.2 Plaintiffs seek both injunctive and monetary relief.
Deborah Kay Nicely and Linda Huggins move this Court, pursuant to Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a preliminary determination that this action may be maintained as a class…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In re Tetracycline CasesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Dameron v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Haley v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.