Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Board of Regents

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The appellant-owners contend that the burden of proof should not have been placed on them and to do so violates due process of law as required by the Fourteenth amendment of the United States constitution, in that sec. 13, art. I of the Wisconsin constitution provides that property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation; that it was error for the trial court to allow the city building inspector to testify that Brenlo was an apartment building; and that it was error for the trial court to allow condemnor to examine Mr. Loeb concerning information contained in his income…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Upper Lakes Shipping, Ltd. v. Seafarers' International UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. McFarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. VoneshCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Kovach v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Milwaukee Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Currie v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API