Legal Opinion

Most Worshipful PHG Lodge v. Hiram Grand Lodge

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 19, 1951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

80 A.2d 294 (1951)

MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS OF DELAWARE, Inc.

v.

HIRAM GRAND LODGE MASONIC TEMPLE, Inc., et al.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

April 19, 1951.

Louis L. Redding, Wilmington, for plaintiff.

H. Albert Young, and Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr. (of Young and Wood), Wilmington, for defendants.

SEITZ, Vice Chancellor.

Plaintiff seeks a review of an election of directors by the stockholders of the defendant corporation.

Plaintiff, as the holder of a majority of the defendant corporation's common stock, sought and was refused the right to vote its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows Inc. v. RinglingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  2. Electrical Research Products, Inc. v. Vitaphone Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Ringling v. Ringling Bros.—Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946
  4. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Free & Accepted Masons of Delaware, Inc. v. Hiram Grand Lodge Masonic Temple, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1951
  5. Truitt v. FaheySuperior Court of Delaware · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Echols v. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API