State v. Jordan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The defendant, after a trial to the Court, was found guilty of evading responsibility in violation of General Statutes § 14-224 and has appealed from the judgment. In response to the defendant’s request, the court filed a finding to which the defendant addressed a motion to correct which was denied. This was followed by an assignment of errors, including so-called errors apparent *563on the face of the record and errors in the conduct of the trial and in the conclusion reached by the court that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. “This last assignment raises the ultimate question…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. DeBiasoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004