Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 27, 1969No. File No. MV 14-57278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.

The defendant, after a trial to the Court, was found guilty of evading responsibility in violation of General Statutes § 14-224 and has appealed from the judgment. In response to the defendant’s request, the court filed a finding to which the defendant addressed a motion to correct which was denied. This was followed by an assignment of errors, including so-called errors apparent *563on the face of the record and errors in the conduct of the trial and in the conclusion reached by the court that the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. “This last assignment raises the ultimate question…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  2. State v. GarganoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. State v. CianfloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. State v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. State v. NashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. State v. DeBiasoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970
  3. State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API