Nicola Fabrizi, Administrator of the Estate of Maria Fabrizi, Deceased v. Kramer Brothers Freight Lines, Incorporated, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The single issue presented by this appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdicts returned by a jury were grossly excessive. There is no indication that the District Court acted arbitrarily or that it failed to exercise its discretion in a judicial manner. As we stated in Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc., 3 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 285, 288: “ * * * that is the extent of our concern as a reviewing court.” See also Brest v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., 3 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 331 and Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trowbridge v. Abrasive Co. Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Fabrizi v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Robert Brest, Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Bauer, Deceased v. Philadelphia Transportation Company and William G. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- John Birch Society v. National Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Brauer v. James J. Igoe & Sons Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- A. B. McMahan Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Amphenol Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.