Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits a prospective employer from refusing to hire an applicant in order to avoid accommodating a religious practice that it could accommodate without undue hardship. The question presented is whether this prohibition applies only where an applicant has informed the employer of his need for an accommodation.
I
We summarize the facts in the light most favorable to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), against whom the Tenth Circuit granted summary judgment. Respondent Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., operates several lines of clothing…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
3Cited by303 opinions
- Jerberee Jefferson v. Sewon America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Groff v. DeJoySupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Brennan v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Groff v. DeJoySupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Catastrophe Management SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.