Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Fryberger v. Kiewit Pacific Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 14, 2014No. Case No. 12-cv-02698-JSTPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re: ECF No. 78
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING STAY
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, to Stay. ECF No. 78. The Court will grant in part and deny in part the motion to dismiss, and grant the motion to stay.
I. BACKGROUND
The background of this case is discussed in more detail in the Court’s prior Order, ECF No. 69, United States v. Kiewit Pac. Co., 2013 WL 5770514 (N.D.Cal. Oct. 24, 2013).
Relators Rusty Fryberger, Steve…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States ex rel. Lupo v. Quality Assurance Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Brach v. Conflict Kinetics Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Irving v. PAE Government Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Brunelle v. PeaceHealthDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- County of Kern v. Tyler Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.