Legal Opinion

Goree v. Georgia Industrial Home

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1938No. 12299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Since the only questions for determination relate to orders sustaining motions to dismiss the answer and cross-petition *373filed by the heirs at law, the decision of this court must depend solely upon the facts alleged in such answer and cross-petition, considered with the suit for direction. Griffin v. Russell, 144 Ga. 275 (2) (87 S. E. 10, L. R. A. 1916 F, 216, Ann. Cas. 1917 D, 994); Pollard v. Blalock, 147 Ga. 406 (2) (94 S. E. 226). Under these facts, did the legacy to the governing authorities of the Central Howard Association lapse, and should this portion of the estate be awarded to the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. MacKenzie v. Trustees of the PresbyterySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905
  5. Teele v. Bishop of DerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Moss v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Perkins v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Houston v. Mills Memorial Home Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Warren v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API