Legal Opinion

Houston v. Mills Memorial Home Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1947No. 15871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only question presented for determination by the writ of error is whether the will of Mary Ellen Kichardson created a valid charitable trust by the use of the language, “for the benefit of . . ‘An Old Falk’s Home.’ ” An affirmative answer will necessarily dispose of the present controversy, since it is not contended that the trial court’s disposition of the one-half interest in the trust estate under the doctrine of cy pres (Code, § 108-202) was erroneous, provided there was no lapse of this legacy. The plaintiffs in error take the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Philip's ParishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Beall v. Surviving Executors of FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Moss v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Huger v. Protestant Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Newson v. StarkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McLucas v. State Bridge Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. United Hospitals Service Ass'n v. Fulton CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Strother v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  5. Roughton v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API