Legal Opinion

State of CA v. Del Rosa

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 18, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00743Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 State of California, No. 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-SCR 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Phillip Del Rosa, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In a previous order, this court held defendant Darren Rose in contempt for violations of 18 | the preliminary injunction in this action. See generally Prev. Order (Feb. 28, 2024), ECF No. 71. 19 | The court permitted California to seek sanctions “to ensure compliance with the court’s order,” 20 | including attorneys’ fees and costs. See id. at 7-8. California has now filed its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Juan Manuel Morales v. City of San Rafael and Daniel HulettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API