Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Calbone

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2004No. 03-6057, 03-6150PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Gamble and Kenneth Popejoy, OMahoma state inmates appearing pro se, appeal from the district court’s denial of their habeas petitions brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petitions alleged violation of the inmates’ Due Process rights because respondent revoked their earned credits in prison disciplinary proceedings for criminal acts they did not commit. In each case, we granted a certificate of appealability (COA) on the issue whether some evidence supports their disciplinary convictions for violation of OMa. Stat. tit. 21, § 1541.1. In Mr. Popejoy’s case,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Robert SalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Cumbey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Canady v. ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Hernandez v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Paul Eichwedel v. Brad CurryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Magar v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Wilson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Martin v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. S.U. Ex Rel. Feldman v. Youth Care of Utah, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API