Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Salzano
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 16, 1998No. 97-3337PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Before: EBEL, HENRY, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.
*1110ORDER
The appellee’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for en banc consideration is denied.
The panel voted to deny rehearing with Judge Briscoe dissenting.
A poll was requested on the en banc suggestion. Voting in favor of en banc rehearing were Judges Tacha, Baldoek, Briscoe and Murphy. Voting against en banc rehearing were Chief Judge Seymour and Judges Porf-ilio, Anderson, Brorby, Ebel, Henry and Lucero. Judge Kelly did not participate.
Because a majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service voted to deny the petition for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Terry L. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Wade, Christopher JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. SantosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MassenburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.