Legal Opinion

Richter Enterprises, Inc. v. Sully County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1997No. 19603PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Richter Enterprises, Inc. and Kenneth Barber (Taxpayer) appeal the circuit court’s decision to affirm the Sully County Director of Equalization’s (Director) assessment of value to two parcels of commercial property in Sully County. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] On March 5, 1993, Taxpayer purchased two parcels of property in the City of Onida, Sully County, South Dakota. The buildings located on these parcels both share a common wall with the Onida Masonic Hall. Located in the building on the east is the ASCS office; located in the building on the west…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Knodel v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, ETC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. PhillipsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kost v. KostSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Baatz v. Arrow BarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. National Food Corp. v. Aurora County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Butte County v. VallerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Town Square Limited Partnership v. Clay County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Burke v. Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Amert v. Lake County Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Clarkson and Co. v. Harding CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API