Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Fourth Avenue Supermarket, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 9, 2009No. 1070771PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Chief Justice.

Brenda Williamson, the defendant in the underlying action, appealed from the denial of her postjudgment motions following a bench trial that resulted in a judgment against Williamson. On March 21, 2008, Fourth Avenue Supermarket, Inc. (“the Supermarket”), the plaintiff below, filed a motion to dismiss Williamson’s appeal as untimely. On April 15, 2008, this Court advised the parties that it would consider the motion to dismiss at the time of the submission of the case on the merits. The case has been submitted on the merits; we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

Facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. City of Huntsville v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Richburg v. CromwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. New Addition Club, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Burgess v. BurgessCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Austin v. AustinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  3. Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Ballard v. Lee A. McWilliams Constr., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  5. Montgomery County Department of Human Resources v. N.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API