Legal Opinion

Richburg v. Cromwell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 4, 1983No. 81-808PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for new trial or, in the alternative, JNOV.

We affirm.

Plaintiffs sued the defendants for damages for personal injuries and property damage arising out of an automobile accident. Defendants filed a counterclaim for damage to their vehicle.

The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants on both the plaintiffs' claim and the defendants' counterclaim on February 3, 1982.

Defendants filed their motion for new trial on March 1, 1982. The motion was set for hearing on March 23, 1982, but…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  2. Dobyne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Cowen v. M.S. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Williamson v. Fourth Avenue Supermarket, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Coleman v. BAC ServicingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API