Legal Opinion

Succession of Watkins

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1924No. 25910PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment appointing an administrator of a succession. The appellant is the widow of the deceased, J. B. Watkins. She claims that the succession does not owe any debts, and that the appointment' of an administrator imposes unnecessary expense upon her. The appellees are the collateral heirs of the deceased, inheriting his separate estate, and the sheriff, in his capacity of collector of inheritance taxes. There are no heirs in the ascending ' or descending line. The widow therefore inherits her husband’s half of the property belonging to the marital community, and owns…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharp v. ZellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Succession of AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. McWilliams v. StairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Succession of GreenlawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. FrostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Slaton v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  3. Succession of FarleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Succession of GollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API