Legal Opinion
Moore v. City of Detroit
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 1987No. Docket 76710PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: Beasley, P.J., and M. J. Kelly and M. Warshawsky, * JJ. M. J. Kelly, J.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for a decision on whether Detroit City Ordinance No. 556-H "unconstitutionally deprives property owners of their property interests without due process of law or just compensation.” 424 Mich 905; 384 NW2d 399 (1986). We had expressly declined to consider this issue in our earlier opinion for reasons stated therein. 146 Mich App 448, 457-458; 382 NW2d 482 (1985). Having now considered the issue as directed by the Supreme Court, we hold that Ord. 556-H…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- McGhee v. POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY, IADistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Rental Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997