Legal Opinion

Hargrove v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 7, 1989No. 13-88-387-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, and the trial court assessed punishment at a fine of $500 and confinement for 180 days in the Harris County Jail probated for two years. Appellant raises one point of error challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

Appellant contends the evidence fails to show that he drove while intoxicated. An appellate court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Annis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Whisenant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Dorsche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. In Re IveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Zavala v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Hartman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. State v. Mercier, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  5. Dix v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API