Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1991No. 128-90PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

WHITE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in a bench trial of the offense of burglary of a building. At his punishment hearing, appellant pled not true to the second paragraph and true to the third paragraph 1 of the indictment. The trial court excluded the State’s proof of the second paragraph and found those allegations not true. The court then found the allegations in the third paragraph true and sentenced appellant to twenty years confinement.

Appellant appealed and the State cross-appealed. The State contended that the trial court’s actions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Wolfe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Ex Parte RuizCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Seven PointsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pfeiffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Linder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  4. Connor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Nevarez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API