Legal Opinion
Sigman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2000No. Nos. 98-35913, 98-35922, 98-35935 to 98-35939, 98-35946 to 98-35948, 98-35950, 98-35951, 98-35960 to 98-35963, 98-35965 to 98-35967 and 98-36077PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The United States has filed a Petition for Rehearing and/or Clarification. Rehearing is not appropriate. The opinion filed on March 29, 2000 in this matter resolves only the jurisdictional issues raised by the government’s invocation of sovereign immunity, and on remand, the government is not precluded from intro-*790during evidence to establish it complied with applicable standards and regulations.
The slip opinion filed March 29, 2000 is amended as follows:
Slip op. 3587 [208 F.3d 760], replace text of first full paragraph starting at line 12 with the following:... must fail because the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Miriam L. Vickers v. United States of America United States Department of Justice Immigration Andnaturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alfrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gonzalez Ex Rel. A.F. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Nunsuch Ex Rel. Nunsuch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Carcamo-Lopez v. Does 1 through 20District Court, W.D. Texas · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.