Legal Opinion
Arizona v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 9, 1979No. 8 ORIGPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
439 U.S. 419 (1979)
ARIZONA
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
No. 8, Orig.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided June 3, 1963.
Decree entered March 9, 1964.
Amended decree entered February 28, 1966.
Argued October 10, 1978.
Decided and supplemental decree entered January 9, 1979.
ON JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE AND MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE.
Ralph E. Hunsaker argued the cause for complainant.
Douglas B. Noble, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for defendant State of California et al. Robert P. Will argued the cause for defendant Metropolitan Water District of Southern…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bullock v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bryant v. YellenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a Public Agency of the State of California, and the Coachella Valley Water District, a Public Agency of the State of California v. The United States of America Donald P. Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, and Quechan Indian Tribe Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, and Colorado River Indian Tribes, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of California and State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.