The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, a Public Agency of the State of California, and the Coachella Valley Water District, a Public Agency of the State of California v. The United States of America Donald P. Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior, and Quechan Indian Tribe Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, and Colorado River Indian Tribes, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of California and State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
830 F.2d 139
The METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, a
public agency of the State of California, and the Coachella
Valley Water District, a public agency of the State of
California, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America; Donald P. Hodel, Secretary,
U.S. Department of Interior, Defendants-Appellants,
and
QUECHAN INDIAN TRIBE; Fort Mojave Indian Tribe, and
Colorado River Indian Tribes,
Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 86-6332, 86-6741.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. PatchakSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.