Legal Opinion

Bareham & McFarland, Inc. v. Kane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1930PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

This action was brought in the City Court of Rochester, Civil Branch, to recover the unpaid balance of the purchase price of a heating plant, which the plaintiff installed in the residence of defendant. The answer consists of three affirmative defenses by way of counterclaims: (1) That defendant has rescinded the contract, because it was induced by fraud, and is entitled to recover the purchase price paid; (2) that defendant has a cause of action against the plaintiff for breach of an express warranty; (3) that defendant is entitled to recover from the plaintiff the damages which he has…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Adams v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. French v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Koch v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. People Ex Rel. Peters v. Murphy-KnightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Lefebvre Intergraphics, Inc. v. Sanden MacHine Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1939
  5. Ellen v. HeacockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API