Legal Opinion

Hooper v. C. M. Steel, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1989No. 8826SC1234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

As a preliminary matter, we note that the entry of summary judgment for fewer than all the defendants is not a final judgment and may not be appealed in the absence of certification pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure unless the entry of summary judgment affected a substantial right. G.S. 1-277, 7A-27(d); Bernick v. Jurden, 306 N.C. 435, 438-39, 293 S.E. 2d 405, 408 (1982). In the present case, plaintiffs have a substantial right to have the liability of both defendants determined in the same trial in order to avoid the possibility of inconsistent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Wilkie v. . StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Caldwell v. A.R.B., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Hinson v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. GilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Williams v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API