Legal Opinion
Chanpreet Kaur v. Robert Wilkinson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 29, 2021No. 18-73001PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHANPREET KAUR, No. 18-73001 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A213-086-008 ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 22, 2021 * Pasadena, California Filed January 29, 2021 Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Mary H. Murguia, and Eric D. Miller, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Wardlaw; Dissent by Judge Miller * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Doris Rodriguez-Zuniga v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Rebeca Cristobal Antonio v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Stephen Fon v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.