Legal Opinion

Stephen Fon v. Merrick Garland

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2022No. 20-73166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN TAMUFOR FON, No. 20-73166 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A203-679-900 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 7, 2021 * San Francisco, California Filed May 18, 2022 Before: Susan P. Graber and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer Choe-Groves, ** Judge. * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** The Honorable Jennifer…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frankie Greer v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  2. Rebeca Cristobal Antonio v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Singh v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Corpeno-Romero v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Lapadat v. BondiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API