Legal Opinion
John M. O'Quinn, P.C. v. Wood
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)
Decided December 21, 2007No. 12-07-00050-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRIAN HOYLE, Justice.
John M. O’Quinn, P.C. d/b/a O’Quinn & Laminack; John M. O’Quinn & Associates, a Texas General Partnership; John M. O’Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. d/b/a O’Quinn & Laminack; John M. O’Quinn Law Firm, P.L.L.C.; and O’Quinn & Lam-inack (collectively “O’Quinn”) bring a parallel interlocutory appeal and mandamus proceeding 1 complaining of the trial court’s order denying, on the merits, its motion to vacate the arbitration panel’s class determination award. 2 We dismiss O’Quinn’s interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction and deny its petition for writ of mandamus.
Backgr…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cypress Communications, Inc. v. ZachariasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In Re Arbitration Between, United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. City of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re Bertha Arce, Relator v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2025