State ex rel. Specht v. Oregon City Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I
Appellant, in his first proposition of law, asserts, in essence, that R. C. 124.34 mandates that any suspension of a classified civil service employee be imposed by the “appointing authority,” i.e., appellee, and, therefore, neither superintendents, assistant superintendents nor business managers have the authority to suspend a school district civil service employee. Stated otherwise, appellant claims his suspension is invalid because it was not imposed directly by the appellee, but rather by the assistant superintendent.
We find no merit in this assertion.
The decision herein is limited to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Village of Clarington v. AltharOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Toledo v. GfellOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Grant v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re CarrollOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.