Legal Opinion

Lapasnick v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1988No. 04-87-00179-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*881OPINION

CADENA, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of Bexar County Court at Law No. 5 denying appellant relief in a habeas corpus proceeding in which appellant was charged with the offense of driving while intoxicated. Appellant asserts that the present prosecution is barred because a prior complaint and information, charging him with the same offense had been previously dismissed because of the State’s failure to comply with the Speedy Trial Act, TEX.C0DE CRIM. PROC.ANN. art. 32A.02 (Vernon Supp. 1988).

Appellant’s argument that the pending prosecution is barred and that he is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Chacon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Lowry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lapasnick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Lapasnick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API