Legal Opinion
Lapasnick v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 17, 1990No. 727-88PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant was charged with speeding and driving while intoxicated. When the State failed to try appellant for the speeding charge in the time specified in Art. 32A.02 V.A.C.C.P., the former Speedy Trial Act, the cause was dismissed, with preju dice, by the trial court pursuant to Art. 28.061 V.A.C.C.P. Appellant then moved to have his driving while intoxicated prosecution similarly dismissed. The trial court in that cause dismissed the information with prejudice.
On February 9, 1987, the State filed a new information charging…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Sullivan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Villarreal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- Ravenbark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.